Cincinnati, N. O. & T. Ry. Co. v. Cox

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• examining whether the proposed decree's injunctive relief and disgorgement provisions fell within the SEC's authority under the federal securities laws
• describing the factors for determining a consent decree is fair and reasonable
• granting the plaintiff's request for an ex parte asset freeze based on plaintiff's assertion that the defendants were foreign entities and therefore could easily move assets out of bank or brokerage accounts at a moment’s notice
• permitting the possibility of intervention to object to a consent decree
• district court should not second-guess agency’s public interest determination unless “participants in this proceeding … set forth a legitimate basis for concluding that the consent decree would harm the public or bar private litigants from pursuing their own claims”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).