Cincinnati, N. O. & T. P. Ry. Co. v. Davis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “an indicative ruling on the very issue on appeal only interrupts the appellate process”
• declining to issue an indicative ruling because it would “do little to aid the Second Circuit’s consideration of the appeal”
• denying a Rule 62.1 motion to amend a complaint where the amendment would require the court to reverse its earlier decision on standing, and the issue of standing was before the court of appeals
• “Indicative rulings allow for the timely resolution of motions which may further the appeal or obviate its necessity.”
• an indicative ruling based on additional facts \would do little to aid\ the court of appeals where the issue on appeal was a question of law
• “[A]n indicative ruling on the very issue on appeal only interrupts the appellate process.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).