Skip to main content
· 1/15/1857

Cincinnati & Little Rock Slate Co. v. Bridge

Citations

  • 18 Ark. 597

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining distinction “between materials proffered to ‘supplement’ or to ‘complete’ the administrative record”
  • order denying a motion to supplement the administrative record

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hanly

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.