Cincinnati Insurance v. Sherman & Hemstreet, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that \[w]hen determining whether a proper chain of custody has been established courts examine whether there is a 'reasonable probability that no tampering occurred' \
• “When determining whether a proper chain of custody has been established[,] courts examine whether there is a ‘reasonable probability that no tampering occurred.’” (quoting Breeding v. State, 220 Md. 193, 199 (1959))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).