Cincinnati Insurance v. River City Construction Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• the rule in Schal Bovis would unfairly protect Auto Owners from paying for the benefit it received — release from liability
• it is well established that excess insurers cannot seek equitable contribution from primary insurers
• the rule in Schal Bovis would unfairly protect Auto Owners from paying for the benefit it received–release from liability
• \it is well established that excess insurers cannot seek equitable contribution from primary insurers\
• “it is well established that excess insurers cannot seek equitable contribution from primary insurers”
• it is well established that excess insurers cannot seek equitable contribution from primary insurers

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).