Cincinnati Insurance v. PPL Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The defendant may be convicted even though he did not know that his statement was material.”
• where the court said an indictment was valid if it set out the specific purpose of the grand jury inquiry and stated that defendant’s testimony was material thereto. The specific United States Code sections involved were pleaded in the indictment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).