Skip to main content
· 6/27/2007

Cincinnati Insurance v. Magnolia Estates, Inc.

Citations

  • 648 S.E.2d 498
  • 286 Ga. App. 183
  • 2007 Fulton County D. Rep. 2106
  • 2007 Ga. App. LEXIS 725

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “If a provision of an insurance policy is susceptible to more than one interpretation, [the court] construes such provision against the insurer.”
  • attack on nursing home resident was not foreseeable to insured nursing home and was “properly characterized as accidental for purposes of coverage”
  • “In Georgia, insurance is a matter of contract, and the parties to an insurance policy are bound by its plain and unambiguous terms. If the language in the contract is unambiguous, we will enforce the policy as written.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ruffin, Blackburn, Bernes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.