Cincinnati Insurance v. Hertz Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting Hertz’s claim that it was not an “insurer” under Nevada’s insurance laws where “insurer” defined to include “every person engaged as principal and as indemnitor surety or contractor in the business of entering into contracts of insurance”
• ‘[B]y offering liability insurance, Hertz has demonstrated a willingness to engage in the business of entering into contracts of insurance * * *. As such, Defendant’s contention that they cannot be considered an “insurer” is not well taken.’ (Citation omitted.)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).