Cincinnati Insurance Company v. Flanders Electric Motor Service, Incorporated

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the releases of PCB were commonplace events which resulted from twenty years of improper waste handling and storage practices
• \The fact that one or more of these spills or leaks may have occurred suddenly and accidentally does not alter our conclusion.\
• “The fact that one or more of these spills or leaks may have occurred suddenly and accidentally does not alter our conclusion.”
• “The existence of multiple dictionary definitions does not compel the conclusion that a term is ambiguous.”
• “Although several courts have considered the public record from the development and regulatory approval of the pollution exclusion . . . we will not look beyond the unambiguous policy language.”’
• “If the underlying factual basis of a claim, even if proved true, would not result in liability under an insurance policy, the insurer may properly refuse to defend its insured.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).