Skip to main content
· 11/25/2009

Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Trosky

Citations

  • 918 N.E.2d 1
  • 2009 Ind. App. LEXIS 2519
  • 2009 WL 4110950

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \[A] choice-of-law analysis is necessary only when there is a conflict between the laws of the states in question.\
  • severing exclusion of government vehicle from underinsured- motorist provision

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Friedlander, Baker, Riley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.