Skip to main content
· 2/22/2002

Cincinnati Ins. Company v. Tuscaloosa Parking Auth.

Citations

  • 827 So. 2d 765
  • 2002 Ala. LEXIS 63
  • 2002 WL 254108

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • coverage triggered with unauthorized salaries obtained during employee dishonesty; drawing distinction that “salaries” means only “authorized salaries” and such salaries were “stolen” not “earned”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Houston

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.