· 3/18/1891
Cincinnati, Indianapolis, St. Louis & Chicago Railway Co. v. Smith
Citations
- 127 Ind. 461
- 26 N.E. 1009
- 1891 Ind. LEXIS 234
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- absent an agreement between the parties, a spouse is not entitled to reimbursement for expenditures made during the marriage to improve the other spouse’s separate (nonmarital) property
- absent an agreement between the parties, a spouse is not entitled to reimbursement for expenditures made during the marriage to improve the other spouse's separate (nonmarital) property
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Coffey
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.