Skip to main content
· 3/18/1891

Cincinnati, Indianapolis, St. Louis & Chicago Railway Co. v. Smith

Citations

  • 127 Ind. 461
  • 26 N.E. 1009
  • 1891 Ind. LEXIS 234

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • absent an agreement between the parties, a spouse is not entitled to reimbursement for expenditures made during the marriage to improve the other spouse’s separate (nonmarital) property
  • absent an agreement between the parties, a spouse is not entitled to reimbursement for expenditures made during the marriage to improve the other spouse's separate (nonmarital) property

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Coffey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.