Cincinnati (City) v. Puchta

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• government's motion to dismiss denied; contracting officer's inaction constituted a denial of claim, thus jurisdiction properly invoked; case later remanded to contracting officer for decision within 190 days
• “I will endeavor to respond to you on each of them by 13 Mar 92, or if unable to respond by that time, I will advise you by 13 Mar 92 when I will respond.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).