Cinapian v. Holder

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding a due process violation where the petitioners were not given a pre-hearing opportunity to review forensic reports concluding that the petitioners’ documents were fraudulent and DHS did not make the reports’ author available for cross-examination
• had the government given petitioners a chance to examine forensic reports before hearing, they may have been able to produce rebuttal evidence
• had the government given petitioners a chance to examine forensic reports before hearing, they may have been able to produce rebuttal evidence
• had the government given petitioners a chance to examine forensic reports before hearing, they may have been able to produce rebuttal evidence
• “Remand is generally necessary when an alien is prevented from reasonably presenting her case or when an IJ’s actions prevent the introduction of significant testimony.”
• “Remand is generally necessary when an alien is prevented from reasonably presenting her case or when an IJ’s actions prevent the introduction of significant testimony.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).