Ninth Circuit· 6/3/2009

Cinapian v. Holder

Citations

567 F.3d 1067
2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 11951
2009 WL 1532203

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

finding a due process violation where the petitioners were not given a pre-hearing opportunity to review forensic reports concluding that the petitioners’ documents were fraudulent and DHS did not make the reports’ author available for cross-examination
had the government given petitioners a chance to examine forensic reports before hearing, they may have been able to produce rebuttal evidence
had the government given petitioners a chance to examine forensic reports before hearing, they may have been able to produce rebuttal evidence
had the government given petitioners a chance to examine forensic reports before hearing, they may have been able to produce rebuttal evidence
“Remand is generally necessary when an alien is prevented from reasonably presenting her case or when an IJ’s actions prevent the introduction of significant testimony.”
“Remand is generally necessary when an alien is prevented from reasonably presenting her case or when an IJ’s actions prevent the introduction of significant testimony.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hawkins, Berzon, Clifton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Cinapian v. Holder

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Cinapian v. Holder
Ninth Circuit· 2009-06-03

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.