Skip to main content
· 8/13/1998

Cimino v. US SEC. Ins. Co.

Citations

  • 715 So. 2d 1092
  • 1998 WL 476218

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reasoning that when a PIP examination is necessary, the relationship is clearly adversarial and finding the presence of a third party not precluded under the statute or contract

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Allen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.