Skip to main content
· 4/26/2000

Cimarusti v. Superior Court

Citations

  • 94 Cal. Rptr. 2d 336
  • 79 Cal. App. 4th 799

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that agency evidentiary and discovery decisions are reviewed for abuse of discretion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Charles S. Vogel

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.