Skip to main content
· 12/14/2000

Cigna Lloyds Insurance Co. v. Bradleys' Electric, Inc.

Citations

  • 33 S.W.3d 102
  • 2000 WL 1663655

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that while an “advertising injury” may in some instances cover patent infringement resulting from advertising activities, the facts alleged must be examined and not the legal theories
  • holding that while an “advertising injury” may in some instances cover patent infringement resulting from advertising activities, the facts alleged must be examined and not the legal theories
  • holding that while an “advertising injury” may in some instances cover patent infringement resulting from advertising activities, the facts alleged must be examined and not the legal theories

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Chief Justice Seerden and Justices Yaâ—ez and Rodriguez

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.