CIGNA Ins. Co. v. Didimoi Prop. Holdings, NV

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that Kwaiser does not provide a “clear” answer as to whether courts or appraisers should resolve causation disputes
• explaining that Kwaiser does not provide a “clear” answer as to whether courts or appraisers should resolve causation disputes
• noting that questions about coverage and policy exclusions are legal questions for the courts
• noting that if the court did not allow appraisers to consider causation, it “would be reserving a plethora of detailed' damage assessments for judicial review, thereby debunking the purpose of appraisal which is to minimize the need for judicial intervention”
• faulting parties for confusing A amount of loss, @ and A coverage, @ and concluding, under circumstances of case, determination of amount of loss under appraisal clause included determination of causation
• parties “may not contest the decision on amount of loss reached by the umpire and at least one of the appraisers as a result of the appraisal process”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).