Cigna Healthcare of St. Louis, Inc. v. Timothy N. Kaiser

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• the “decision to abstain” from addressing parallel proceedings is “close[ly] relat[ed]” to “normal docket control” or “judicial economy”
• the “decision to abstain” from addressing parallel proceedings is “close[ly] relat[ed]” to “normal docket control” or “judicial economy”
• The FAA “requires both federal and state courts to apply a federal common law of arbitrability Nos. 02-2754, 02-2835 & 02-2548 17 to the arbitration of disputes arising under contracts in commerce, a common law applicable equally in federal and state courts.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).