Cierlinski v. Rys
Citations
- 225 Pa. 312
- 74 A. 172
- 1909 Pa. LEXIS 655
Syllabus
<p>Orphans’ court — Jurisdiction—Collateral attack on decree — Widow’s exemption.</p> <p>1. The orphans’ court is a court of record and its decrees within its jurisdiction stand on the same footing as those of any court of record and cannot be examined collaterally nor set aside except in due course of law by appeal.</p> <p>2. A decree of the orphans’ court awarding a widow real estate as a part of her exemption is conclusive, if unappealed from, and cannot be attacked collaterally in an action of ejectment; and this is the case although the petition for the exemption shows on its face that the widow had remarried before the petition was filed.</p>
Judges: Brown, Fell, Mestrezat, Mitchell, Potter
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Clark EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1923-01-03· cited 12×
- In re Reinstein's EstateSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1919-02-28· cited 2×
- Mosely's EstateCumberland County Orphans' Court· 1940-06-15· cited 1×
- Heckman's EstateFranklin County Orphans' Court· 1932-03-12
- Commonwealth v. TurnerPhiladelphia County Court of Common Pleas· 1940-07-29
- Good v. UpdegraffCumberland County Court of Common Pleas· 1948-09-16
- Gingrich v. ChaplinCambria County Court of Common Pleas· 1948-04-26
Cites
2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.