Ciconett v. Home Ins.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “As there rarely will be extensive 12 damages, a rule of proportionality would discourage vigorous enforcement of FDCPA.”
• reductions “must be based on 7 valid reasons” rather than “mathematical disproportionality” because “there rarely will be 8 extensive damages,” and “a rule of proportionality would discourage vigorous enforcement of [the] 9 FDCPA.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).