Cicle v. Chase Bank USA

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the terms of an arbitration agreement were printed in a sufficiently conspicuous fashion
• holding that an arbitration agreement that was deemed accepted by failure to opt out not unconscionable under Missouri law
• holding that an arbitration agreement that was deemed accepted by failure to opt out not unconscionable under Missouri law
• noting that cost-sharing and cost-shifting provisions in the arbitration agreement saved it from being unconscionable on its face
• noting that arbitration provisions may be invalidated if the contract violates state law, so long as the state law does not make invalidity applicable only to arbitration clauses
• explaining that procedural unconscionability relates to the formalities of the making of an agreement and encompasses, for instance, fine print clauses, high pressure sales tactics or unequal bargaining positions; substantive unconscionability refers to undue harshness in the contract terms

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).