Skip to main content
· 1/16/2004

Cicippio-Puleo v. Islamic Republic of Iran

Citations

  • 353 F.3d 1024
  • 359 U.S. App. D.C. 299
  • 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 644
  • 2004 WL 66771

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • indicating that it “cannot be assumed” that there is any cause of action against a foreign state at all
  • noting that satisfying the requirements of § 1605(a)(7) and the Flatow Amendment serves only to establish jurisdiction
  • holding in light of evolving state of law that “[w]e will therefore remand the case to allow plaintiffs an opportunity to amend their complaint to state a cause of action under some other source of law including state law ...”
  • “As the Supreme Court repeatedly has explained, an official-capacity claim against a government official is in substance a claim against the government itself.”
  • victim was tortured when his captors regularly beat him, threat- ened him with death, and confined him in “deplorable and inhumane conditions”
  • victim was tortured when his captors regularly beat him, threat- ened him with death, and confined him in “deplorable and inhumane conditions”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Edwards, Randolph, Garland

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.