Cichon v. Lemke

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming the denial of Rule 60(b) motion and stating that relief under Rule 60(b) is “an extraordinary remedy for exceptional situations”
• affirming the denial of Rule 60(b) motion and stating that relief under Rule 60(b) is \an extraordinary remedy for exceptional situations\
• rejecting debtor’s argument that errors were immaterial “because they worked neither to his benefit nor to the detriment of any creditor”
• after a bench trial on an adversary proceeding, we review the bankruptcy court's legal determinations de novo and its findings of fact for clear error
• after a bench trial on an adversary proceeding, we review the bankruptcy court’s legal determinations de novo and its findings of fact for clear error
• “We cannot entertain claims that factual findings were clearly erroneous when the party claiming error fails to include in the appellate record the evidence we would need to evaluate the claim.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).