Cichon v. Belton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the Appeals Council’s rejection of an examining medical expert’s testimony was not supported by substantial evidence
• holding that the Appeals Council’s rejection of an examining medical expert’s testimony was not supported by substantial evidence
• remanding ease to allow plaintiff to present further evidence; evidence “once irrelevant” but, due to the 1996 amendment, now rendered material
• remanding to allow claimant “an opportunity to present evidence as to whether claimant’s dis- ability would have continued if she stopped using drugs or alcohol”
• noting that under the relevant Social Security Administration (“SSA”
• ALJ must reference specific evidence in 16 medical record to reject non-examining doctor’s medical opinion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).