Cicena Ltd. And Cicena, Inc. v. Columbia Telecommunications Group

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that use of eighteen months is “evidence point[ing] strongly away from a finding of secondary meaning”
• strong market demand for a product usually indicates product desirability not secondary meaning
• use for only 18 months is \evidence pointing strongly away from a finding of secondary meaning\
• use of only 18 months is “evidence point[ing] strongly away from a finding of secondary meaning”
• defendant’s product design was an effort to capitalize on a desirable product feature than to trade on any trademark rights acquired by plaintiff in that design

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).