Skip to main content
· 8/11/2000

Ciba-Geigy Corporation v. United States

Citations

  • 223 F.3d 1367
  • 22 I.T.R.D. (BNA) 1289
  • 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 19843
  • 2000 WL 1141256

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[b]oth parties agree that [the imported products] generally fall within the definition of ‘organic chemicals’ ”
  • \It is Congress's task to change the words of the statute.\
  • claim of unfinished inks according to GRI 2(a), not addressed
  • “The plain language of Note 1(a), read in conjunction with Note 2(f) of Chapter 29, can only be interpreted to mean that Headings 3203 and 3204 are the only acceptable classifications within Chapter 32 for a ‘separate chemically defined compound.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Michel, Lourie, Rader

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.