Skip to main content
· 10/18/1972

Chustak v. Northern Indiana Public Service Co.

Citations

  • 288 N.E.2d 149
  • 259 Ind. 390
  • 1972 Ind. LEXIS 492

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that, where no ruling on party’s motion to produce appeared in the record, court on appeal could not assume trial court overruled party’s motion and party waived review of alleged error
  • “A party may not wait until the last possible moment to act, then rely upon the discovery rules and expect the court to halt its proceedings in order to accommodate his motion”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Prentice, Arterburn, Debruler, Givan, Hunter

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.