California Supreme Court· 6/2/1890
Churchill v. Lauer
Citations
- 84 Cal. 233
- 24 P. 107
- 1890 Cal. LEXIS 796
Syllabus
<p>Pleading — Parties — Diversion of Water —• Misjoinder. — Several persons, having separate tracts of land through which a stream of water flows, may join as plaintiffs to restrain the diversion of the stream at a point above their lands.</p>
Judges: Hayne
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Rank v. (Krug) United StatesS.D. California· 1956-07-11· cited 46×
- Mitchell v. BainIndiana Supreme Court· 1895-11-26· cited 45×
- Rait v. FurrowSupreme Court of Kansas· 1906-06-09· cited 21×
- Frost v. Alturas Water Co.Idaho Supreme Court· 1905-07-15· cited 15×
- Nevada Cornell Silver Mines, Inc. v. HankinsNevada Supreme Court· 1929-07-05· cited 14×
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Cadigan v. BrownMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1876-09-07· cited 42×
- Murray v. HayNew York Court of Chancery· 1845-08-25· cited 35×
- Blasingame v. Home Ins. Co. of City of N.Y.California Supreme Court· 1888-04-27· cited 34×
- Heeser v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court· 1888-10-19· cited 30×
- Heilbron v. FowLer Switch Canal Co.California Supreme Court· 1888-03-29· cited 29×
- Whitby v. RowellCalifornia Supreme Court· 1890-01-29· cited 9×
- Barham v. HostetterCalifornia Supreme Court· 1885-08-01· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.