Churchill Downs Inc. v. Thoroughbred Horsemen's Group, LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reasoning that on a 12(b)(6) motion, a 18 “full analysis under the rule of reason would not be appropriate . . . given the fact intensive 19 nature of that analysis”
• reasoning that on a 12(b)(6) motion, a 18 “full analysis under the rule of reason would not be appropriate . . . given the fact intensive 19 nature of that analysis”
• “Commercially motivated group boycotts . . . are ‘designed to pressure another party into doing something by withholding, or enlisting others to withhold, patronage or services from the target.’” (cleaned up)
• “The IHA defines horsemen’s group in relation to a particular racetrack.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).