Churchill Community v. Churchill Crossings

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reversing defendant's sentence because district court erred in attributing drugs to defendant where defendant had not jointly undertaken the criminal activity involving those particular drugs
• agreeing to “assist a drug dealer in one transaction” does not automatically mean a defendant is “responsible for all the drugs sold or possessed by that dealer.”
• upholding district court's decision to attribute quantity of drugs to a co-conspirator despite differences in the drugs' \color and purity\ because the drugs were reasonably foreseeable and within the scope of the conspirators' agreement
• vacating and remanding defendant Phillips’ sentence because “[t]he factual contents of Smith’s PSR — on the basis of which the trial court found joint enterprise as to her — cannot be used against Phillips”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).