Skip to main content

Church v. State

Citations

  • 333 S.W.2d 799
  • 206 Tenn. 336
  • 10 McCanless 336
  • 1960 Tenn. LEXIS 370

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that, unless the matters mentioned in the indictment are essential elements of the crime, they may be disregarded for purposes of sufficiency analysis
  • stating that the desc ription o f the offe nse c harge d mu st be s ufficien t in distinctness, certainty and precision to enable the accused to know what offense he or she is charged with and to understand the special nature of the charge he or she is called up on to an swer

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Maeable, Tomlinson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

40 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.