Tennessee Supreme Court· 3/11/1960
Church v. State
Citations
- 333 S.W.2d 799
- 206 Tenn. 336
- 10 McCanless 336
- 1960 Tenn. LEXIS 370
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that, unless the matters mentioned in the indictment are essential elements of the crime, they may be disregarded for purposes of sufficiency analysis
- stating that the desc ription o f the offe nse c harge d mu st be s ufficien t in distinctness, certainty and precision to enable the accused to know what offense he or she is charged with and to understand the special nature of the charge he or she is called up on to an swer
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Maeable, Tomlinson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
40 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. GriffisCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 1997-04-30· cited 222×
- Eduardo Amador-Gonzalez v. United StatesFifth Circuit· 1968-02-23· cited 206×
- State v. CutshawCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 1997-12-09· cited 142×
- State v. TateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 1995-08-11· cited 84×
- State v. KrognessOregon Supreme Court· 1963-12-31· cited 75×
- Graves v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 1973-10-05· cited 59×
- Bailey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 1972-01-20· cited 53×
- State v. DulsworthCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 1989-06-29· cited 51×
- State of Tennessee v. Perry A. MarchCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 2008-07-15· cited 34×
- Adair v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1967-03-27· cited 30×
- Grundstrom v. BetoN.D. Texas· 1967-08-04· cited 26×
- State v. LindsayCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 1982-03-17· cited 19×
- Seelbach v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 1978-07-06· cited 11×
- Petree v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 1975-06-05· cited 10×
- Gant v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 1969-07-09· cited 9×
- Headrick v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 1974-08-16· cited 9×
- State v. DavisCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 1983-06-20· cited 6×
- Taylor Implement Manufacturing Co. v. United Steelworkers of AmericaTennessee Supreme Court· 1966-11-14· cited 6×
- Coffman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 1970-12-02· cited 5×
- Nunley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 1972-02-10· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.