Church v. Jamison

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• taking judicial notice on its own motion on appeal of the Enforcement Policies and Interpretations Manual of the Division of Labor Standards Enforcement
• “An employee’s right to be paid for 10 HARSTEIN V. HYATT CORP. vacation time that has not been used when the employment ends is addressed by Labor Code section 227.3.”
• “Thus, termination of employment is the event that converts the 10 employer’s obligation to allow an employee to take vacation from work into the monetary 11 obligation to pay that employee for unused vested vacation time.”
• “[T]he 9 statute of limitations cannot be applied as a look-back period to limit an employer’s statutory 10 obligation to pay for all vested vacation time that an employee did not take before the employment 11 was terminated.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).