Court of Appeals of Oregon· 5/15/2003
Church v. Grant County
Citations
- 69 P.3d 759
- 187 Or. App. 518
- 2003 Ore. App. LEXIS 616
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “In the context of statutory construction, a statute’s caption is of no legal significance.”
- “ ‘LUBAis to affirm the county’s interpretation of its own ordinance unless LUBA determines that the county’s interpretation is inconsistent with express language of the ordinance or its apparent purpose or policy.’ ” (Quoting Clark v. Jackson County, 313 Or 508, 836 P2d 710 (1992).
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Edmonds, Deits, Kistler
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Western Land & Cattle, Inc. v. Umatilla CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-08-05· cited 13×
- VanSpeybroeck v. Tillamook CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-08-13· cited 13×
- Just v. City of LebanonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2004-04-21· cited 8×
- Bush v. City of PrinevilleCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2023-03-29· cited 4×
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. City of Oregon CityCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2006-02-15· cited 3×
- State v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-11-14· cited 1×
- Friends of the Metolius v. Jefferson CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2005-07-05
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.