Church of the Good Shepherd v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that a claim for a breach of a settlement agreement is not sufficiently related to the claim creating the original case as to form part of the same case or controversy
• declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction after dismissal of the ERISA claims, which provided basis for original jurisdiction
• declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over state law claims surviving ERISA dismissal
• applying six-year period in 29 U.S.C. § 1113(1) because “This is not a case of fraud because the alleged breach arose from the nonpayment of amounts due to the Funds, and not any misrepresentation or omission made to employees or beneficiaries.”
• “Because the statute of limitations is an affirmative defense, Defendants carry the burden of showing that Plaintiff failed to plead timely claims.”
• “[F]ederal courts do not possess ancillary jurisdiction over new actions in which a federal judgment creditor seeks to impose liability for a money judgment on a person not otherwise liable for the judgment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).