Church of Scientology International v. Mitchell Daniels

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[A]ctual malice cannot be established merely by showing a departure from accepted journalistic or professional practices.”
• “[E]vidence . . . show[ing] that [the publisher] bore ill will toward [the plaintiff] does not help [the plaintiff’s] claim.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).