· 2/22/1993
Chunn v. D'Agostino
Citations
- 312 Ark. 141
- 847 S.W.2d 699
- 1993 Ark. LEXIS 121
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- upholding a guaranty provision identical to the provision at issue here
- “A grant of summary judgment must be affirmed if right for any reason, whether stated or unstated. It is the grant itself that is to be reviewed for error, and not the analysis employed.”
- “A grant of summary judgment must be affirmed if right for any reason, whether stated or unstated. It is the grant itself that is to be reviewed for error, and not the analysis employed.”
- “A grant of summary judgment must be affirmed if right for any reason, whether stated or unstated. It is the grant itself that is to be reviewed for error, and not the analysis employed.”
- “A grant of summary judgment must be affirmed if right for any reason, whether stated or unstated. It is the grant itself that is to be reviewed for error, and not the analysis employed.”
- in a suit to recover on a note and guaranty, defendants’ failure to raise any defense related to plaintiff’s status as a holder or nonholder in possession of the note and guaranty under the Commercial Code resulted in a waiver of that defense
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Glaze, Hays, Newbern
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.