Skip to main content
· 2/22/1993

Chunn v. D'Agostino

Citations

  • 312 Ark. 141
  • 847 S.W.2d 699
  • 1993 Ark. LEXIS 121

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • upholding a guaranty provision identical to the provision at issue here
  • “A grant of summary judgment must be affirmed if right for any reason, whether stated or unstated. It is the grant itself that is to be reviewed for error, and not the analysis employed.”
  • “A grant of summary judgment must be affirmed if right for any reason, whether stated or unstated. It is the grant itself that is to be reviewed for error, and not the analysis employed.”
  • “A grant of summary judgment must be affirmed if right for any reason, whether stated or unstated. It is the grant itself that is to be reviewed for error, and not the analysis employed.”
  • “A grant of summary judgment must be affirmed if right for any reason, whether stated or unstated. It is the grant itself that is to be reviewed for error, and not the analysis employed.”
  • in a suit to recover on a note and guaranty, defendants’ failure to raise any defense related to plaintiff’s status as a holder or nonholder in possession of the note and guaranty under the Commercial Code resulted in a waiver of that defense

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Glaze, Hays, Newbern

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.