Chunk

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that plaintiff’s “medical records [were] relevant to her claim for emotional distress damages”
• ordering a plaintiff to provide signed authorization forms for medical and employment records when they were relevant to her claims
• ordering party to “either supplement her production in response to these document requests, or supplement her discovery responses to indicate that no other responsive documents exist”
• “O’Malley’s medical records are relevant to her claim for emotional distress damages . . . .”
• “Under Rule 37 and the corresponding provision of the Southern District of Ohio’s Local Rules, counsel have an obligation to attempt in good faith to resolve all discovery disputes extrajudicially (i.e., without Court intervention
• “[Plaintiff’s] medical records are relevant to her claim for emotional distress damages”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).