Skip to main content
· 1/21/1998

Chung Ex Rel. Estate of Chung v. Tarom, S.A.

Citations

  • 990 F. Supp. 581
  • 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 994
  • 1998 WL 21644

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • setting out thirteen-factor test to determine whether “subsidiary will be deemed [the parent’s] agent for purposes of service and process”
  • “Mere affiliation does not justify deeming one corporation the agent of another corporation for the service of process.”
  • If “service of process is accomplished entirely within the United States in accordance with state law and the Due Process clause…then the service provisions of the Hague Convention do not apply.”
  • summarizing factors considered by Illinois courts
  • affiliation not enough to show control

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gettleman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.