Skip to main content
· 3/22/2011

Chulsky v. Hudson Law Offices, PC

Citations

  • 777 F. Supp. 2d 823
  • 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 29781
  • 2011 WL 1099003

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting defendants’ argument that the § 1692e(11) exemption for formal pleadings barred the plaintiff’s FDCPA claims where the plaintiff did not assert a violation of the § 1692e(11) disclosure requirement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wolfson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.