Chudson v. Ratra

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that while patient's failure to follow through with treatment did not rise to level of contributory negligence, it was relevant in determining amount of damages
• holding that while patient's failure to follow through with treatment did not rise to level of contributory negligence, it was relevant in determining amount of damages
• \The absence or presence of contributory negligence is generally a question for the jury.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).