Chuck v. Quan Wo Chong & Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding there was evidence of malice where, among other things, the defendant admitted to shooting the victim as the victim was trying to escape
• evidence of malice where appellant shot victim at close range “as he tried to escape”
• malice murder conviction upheld where evidence showed that defendant shot the victim in the back of the head as he tried to get away
• evidence of malice murder was sufficient where, among other things, the “appellant shot the victim in the back of the head at [close] range”
• jury authorized to find evidence of malice where, among other things, the defendant shot the victim in the back of the head
• malice murder conviction upheld where evidence showed that defendant shot the victim in the back of the head as he tried to get away

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).