Chu v. Canadian Indemnity Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding the 12 fortuity analysis differs between first party policies and third party policies, as third party 13 policies look to analogous concepts of “occurrence” and “accident,” rather than 14 “contingent” and “unknown,” to determine fortuity
• “[T]o bar third party liability coverage, the defect causing the postsale 19 damage” must have been known to the insured

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).