Chrysler Motors Corp. v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “It has long been established that as a rule of statutory construction, courts should treat the plain language of [the] statute as controlling absent clear legislative intent to the contrary.”
• “[C]ourts should treat the plain language of a statute as controlling.”
• describing each of the circumstances

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).