Chrysler Insurance Co. v. Greenspoint Dodge of Houston, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that insured could not recover extra-contractual damages because the insurer \ did not breach the insurance contract\
• holding that contract language that can be given certain or definite meaning is not ambiguous and is construed as a matter of law
• holding 9 question of whether contract is ambiguous is one of law for trial court to determine, which is reviewed do novo
• affirming dismissal of extra-contractual claims where plaintiff failed to show that insurer breached insurance contract

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).