Chrysler Financial Corp. v. Dickerson (In Re Dickerson)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• enforcing the 180-day bar of section 109(g)(2) 6 and reversing the decision of a bankruptcy court that had embraced the discretionary view of section 109(g)(2) and declined to follow the 180-day bar
• initially adopting a strict interpretation approach, but later identifying circumstances under which a mechanical application would be inappropriate based on the disposition of the motion for relief
• rejecting a causal reading and finding the statute mandatory

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).