Chrysler Credit Corp. v. Knebel Chevrolet-Buick, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that unless Rule 56(f)4 motions are “dilatory or lacking in merit, the motion should be liberally treated”
• noting that “the Fifth Circuit enumerates eight factors to be considered in determining whether a party has been dilatory in seeking discovery”
• denying a 56(d) request stating “the record reflected] that plaintiffs were dilatory in pursuing discovery prior to the filing of their 56[ (d) ] affidavit”
• denying a 56(d) request stating “the record reflected] that plaintiffs were dilatory in pursuing discovery prior to the filing of their 56[(d)] affidavit”
• denying a 56(d) request stating “the record reflected] that plaintiffs were dilatory in pursuing discovery prior to the filing of their 56[ (d) ] affidavit”
• denying a 56(d) request stating \the record reflects that plaintiffs were dilatory in pursuing discovery prior to the filing of their 56[ (d) ] affidavit\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).