Skip to main content
· 7/16/1998

Chrvala v. Borden, Inc.

Citations

  • 14 F. Supp. 2d 1013
  • 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10866
  • 1998 WL 400735

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that, to prevail on a claim for tortious interference with a prospective business relationship, “a plaintiff must demonstrate: (1) the existence of the prospect of a business relationship; (2) that defendant knew of the plaintiff's prospective relationship; (3
  • “In terms of causation, a plaintiff must show 14 that ‘but for’ the alleged interference the prospective relationship would have been consummated.”
  • “Zimmerman does not stand for the proposition that an employer must be able to prove, with absolute certainty, that the discharged employee engaged in wrongful conduct.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Marbley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.