Chromiak v. California

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• considering the plaintiff's argument that his due process rights were violated by removing his newsracks before holding a hearing
• “[T]he City need not provide ... the least expensive method of exercising ... first amendment freedoms.”
• no due process violation where government provided plaintiff written notice of newsrack ordinance requirements, provided opportunity for him to comply, impounded his news-racks upon his refusal to comply, and scheduled hearing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).