Skip to main content
· 8/2/1972

CHROMCRAFT CORPORATION, Petitioner-Appellee, v. UNITED STATES EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Respondent-Appellant

Citations

  • 465 F.2d 745
  • 4 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1085
  • 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 8087
  • 4 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 7925

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that “§ 706 ... requires ... a showing of prejudice before agency action can be set aside for its lack of punctuality.”
  • EEOC’s delay in serving employer with notice was justified by insufficient personnel to handle workload and Commission’s concern over reprisals
  • delay not unreasonable unless “it has resulted from slothfulness, lethargy, inertia or caprice”
  • provisions of 5 U.S.C. § 706 interpreted
  • provisions of 5 U.S.C. § 706 interpreted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brown, Goldberg, Morgan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.