· 8/2/1972
CHROMCRAFT CORPORATION, Petitioner-Appellee, v. UNITED STATES EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Respondent-Appellant
Citations
- 465 F.2d 745
- 4 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1085
- 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 8087
- 4 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 7925
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that “§ 706 ... requires ... a showing of prejudice before agency action can be set aside for its lack of punctuality.”
- EEOC’s delay in serving employer with notice was justified by insufficient personnel to handle workload and Commission’s concern over reprisals
- delay not unreasonable unless “it has resulted from slothfulness, lethargy, inertia or caprice”
- provisions of 5 U.S.C. § 706 interpreted
- provisions of 5 U.S.C. § 706 interpreted
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Brown, Goldberg, Morgan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.